Tuesday, July 26, 2011

But I Thought It Doesn't Matter?

"Financial Armageddon" has an interesting post. Please follow link to original
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

But I Thought It Doesn't Matter?

If you ask the "analysts" on Wall Street, they'll tell you that the macro picture doesn't matter -- it's all about earnings.

Well, based on following comments from and about several companies that just reported their quarterly results, it sounds like the economy is a lot more important than those "experts" have given it credit for [italics mine].

Texas Instruments:

"Texas Instruments' Profit Forecast Misses Some Estimates" (Bloomberg)

"Production at some computing and consumer manufacturers appears lukewarm even though we're heading into the back-to- school and holiday seasons," Chief Executive Officer Rich Templeton said in the statement.

...

[Chief Financial Officer Kevin March said] “no one can ignore the glaring headlines. We’ve gotten lackluster outlooks from our customers in the computer and consumer segments.”

HCA Holding:

"HCA’s Declining Surgery Rates May Show Slowdown in U.S. Hospital Industry" (Bloomberg)

HCA Holdings Inc.’s report of a drop in expensive surgeries may signal a broad slowdown for hospitals because of rising unemployment and tepid consumer spending.

Patients at HCA, the biggest U.S. hospital chain, sought less-expensive procedures during the quarter, according to the company. Per-patient income from Medicare, the government plan for the elderly, also fell.

UPS:

"UPS Warns About Curbs on Global Economy" (Financial Times)

Dithering over the debt ceiling in the US, concerns about sovereign debt in the European Union and slowing growth in Asia are restraining the global economy, according to top executives at United Parcel Service, the package delivery company.

...

[Chief executive Scott] Davis singled out the political gridlock over debt issues in Washington and continuing high unemployment as creating a weak US economy that was slowing demand for domestic services and also imports from places such as China.

AK Steel, United States Steel, and Nucor:

"Steel Makers Say Slow Economy Will Hit 3Q Results" (Associated Press)

Three of the nation's steel makers expect weakness in the U.S. and global economy will affect their third-quarter performances.

AK Steel Holding Corp. on Tuesday joined United States Steel Corp. and Nucor Corp. in predicting weaker results in the July-to-September quarter. Individual companies cited factors ranging from softer demand, higher costs and lower steel prices to rising supplies that could pressure prices and margins.

UBS:

"UBS Issues Profit Warning on Weaker Economy" (DealBook)

UBS warned on Tuesday that it would probably miss an earnings target set two years ago, after its profit fell by half in the second quarter and the economy weakened.

...

“Banks’ returns have declined over all in the last 12 months, reflecting deleveraging and the actions being taken in advance of increased capital requirements,” [chief executive Oswald J. GrĂ¼bel] said in the statement.

“We are responding to this changed environment and the weakening economic outlook by adapting our business and increasing efficiency,” he said.

Illinois Tool Works:

"Illinois Tool Works 2Q Net Income Disappoints" (Associated Press)

GLENVIEW, Ill. — Industrial materials-maker Illinois Tool Works Inc. said its second-quarter net income and sales came in below expectations as demand was weaker than expected.

Illinois Tool Works makes everything from heavy equipment to adhesive and flooring materials. Its sales are closely tied to broader economic growth. CEO David Speer said the company expects "similar moderating demand levels in the second half of 2011."

Contractionary Fiscal Policy Is Contractionary

This from Bradford DeLong. Of course y'all know this -- it's just our "leaders" and "The Very Serious People" you either can't grasp this, don't know, or just plain DON'T GIVE A DAMN. (please follow link to original)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Contractionary Fiscal Policy Is Contractionary Watch: Great Britain Edition

Remember those claims that Britain was being hammered by winter, and that the British economy would super-snap-back once the snow melted? I do.

David Dayen

British Economy, After Austerity, at Zero Growth in the Past Nine Months: What’s amazing about this debt limit debate, and the headlong rush to austerity, is that we have empirical evidence of what can result, in this kind of economy, when you massively roll back spending. We even know what happens when you do that amid the threat of a debt downgrade rather than the fundamentals of the financial markets. All you have to do is look to Britain, which has never been the same since their austerity package was unveiled by the Tories.

Britain’s economic recovery remains lackluster as official figures Tuesday showed growth of only 0.[8] percent per year in the second quarter of the year from the previous three month period, in part because of the disruption caused by the wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton. The statistics office also said the economy during the period was heavily influenced by the aftermath of the Japanese earthquake and tsunami, record high temperatures in April and the start of ticket sales for the 2012 Olympic Games in London.

The preliminary growth figure, which is subject to revision, was in line with market. But it may put new pressure on the government and the Bank of England to take steps to quicken up the pace of recovery. The weak second quarter followed six months of essentially no growth, with a drop of [2.0] percent per year in the fourth quarter of last year followed by a gain of [2.0] percent per year in the first quarter.

The excuses in this article are ridiculous: did the economy slow down because a lot of people missed the Tube stop at Notting Hill, too? Anyway, didn’t the William and Kate wedding produce a lot of economic activity?

The point is that Britain rolled back demand during a time when the economy was already weak, and they are suffering through the consequences. Instead of looking at this as a problem to be avoided, US policymakers are on the verge of emulating it. And not even in a good way: the British plan was at least somewhat balanced, with tax increases along with the spending cuts. This shows that the idea of a “balanced approach” is still flawed, because either way, you’re reducing demand during a time with a demand shortfall.

In a couple years, if we’re scratching our heads about zero growth, we can simply look to Britain. They are opening a window into our dim future

Monday, July 25, 2011

Sunday, July 24, 2011

Two From Robert Reich

Here are TWO posts from Robert Reich's blog. Read them - then follow the link to the originals, bookmark the site.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Why Medicare Is the Solution — Not the Problem

Friday, July 22, 2011

Not only is Social Security on the chopping block in order to respond to Republican extortion. So is Medicare.

But Medicare isn’t the nation’s budgetary problems. It’s the solution. The real problem is the soaring costs of health care that lie beneath Medicare. They’re costs all of us are bearing in the form of soaring premiums, co-payments, and deductibles.

Medicare offers a means of reducing these costs — if Washington would let it.

Let me explain.

Americans spend more on health care per person than any other advanced nation and get less for our money. Yearly public and private healthcare spending is $7,538 per person. That’s almost two and a half times the average of other advanced nations.

Yet the typical American lives 77.9 years – less than the average 79.4 years in other advanced nations. And we have the highest rate of infant mortality of all advanced nations.

Medical costs are soaring because our health-care system is totally screwed up. Doctors and hospitals have every incentive to spend on unnecessary tests, drugs, and procedures.

You have lower back pain? Almost 95% of such cases are best relieved through physical therapy. But doctors and hospitals routinely do expensive MRI’s, and then refer patients to orthopedic surgeons who often do even more costly surgery. Why? There’s not much money in physical therapy.

Your diabetes, asthma, or heart condition is acting up? If you go to the hospital, 20 percent of the time you’re back there within a month. You wouldn’t be nearly as likely to return if a nurse visited you at home to make sure you were taking your medications. This is common practice in other advanced countries. So why don’t nurses do home visits to Americans with acute conditions? Hospitals aren’t paid for it.

America spends $30 billion a year fixing medical errors – the worst rate among advanced countries. Why? Among other reasons because we keep patient records on computers that can’t share the data. Patient records are continuously re-written on pieces of paper, and then re-entered into different computers. That spells error.

Meanwhile, administrative costs eat up 15 to 30 percent of all healthcare spending in the United States. That’s twice the rate of most other advanced nations. Where does this money go? Mainly into collecting money: Doctors collect from hospitals and insurers, hospitals collect from insurers, insurers collect from companies or from policy holders.

A major occupational category at most hospitals is “billing clerk.” A third of nursing hours are devoted to documenting what’s happened so insurers have proof.

Trying to slow the rise in Medicare costs doesn’t deal with any of this. It will just limit the amounts seniors can spend, which means less care. As a practical matter it means more political battles, as seniors – whose clout will grow as boomers are added to the ranks – demand the limits be increased. (If you thought the demagoguery over “death panels” was bad, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet.)

Paul Ryan’s plan – to give seniors vouchers they can cash in with private for-profit insurers — would be even worse. It would funnel money into the hands of for-profit insurers, whose administrative costs are far higher than Medicare.

So what’s the answer? For starters, allow anyone at any age to join Medicare. Medicare’s administrative costs are in the range of 3 percent. That’s well below the 5 to 10 percent costs borne by large companies that self-insure. It’s even further below the administrative costs of companies in the small-group market (amounting to 25 to 27 percent of premiums). And it’s way, way lower than the administrative costs of individual insurance (40 percent). It’s even far below the 11 percent costs of private plans under Medicare Advantage, the current private-insurance option under Medicare.

In addition, allow Medicare – and its poor cousin Medicaid – to use their huge bargaining leverage to negotiate lower rates with hospitals, doctors, and pharmaceutical companies. This would help move health care from a fee-for-the-most-costly-service system into one designed to get the highest-quality outcomes most cheaply.

Estimates of how much would be saved by extending Medicare to cover the entire population range from $58 billion to $400 billion a year. More Americans would get quality health care, and the long-term budget crisis would be sharply reduced.

Let me say it again: Medicare isn’t the problem. It’s the solution.

[This is drawn from a post I did in April, also before current imboglio]
Share



The Only Social Security Reform Worth Considering: Raising the Ceiling on Income Subject to It

Friday, July 22, 2011

The very idea that Social Security might be on the chopping block in order to pay the ransom Republicans are demanding reveals both the cravenness of their demands and the callowness of the opposition to those demands.

In a former life I was a trustee of the Social Security trust fund. So let me set the record straight.

Social Security isn’t responsible for the federal deficit. Just the opposite. Until last year Social Security took in more payroll taxes than it paid out in benefits. It lent the surpluses to the rest of the government.

Now that Social Security has started to pay out more than it takes in, Social Security can simply collect what the rest of the government owes it. This will keep it fully solvent for the next 26 years.

But why should there even be a problem 26 years from now? Back in 1983, Alan Greenspan’s Social Security commission was supposed to have fixed the system for good – by gradually increasing payroll taxes and raising the retirement age. (Early boomers like me can start collecting full benefits at age 66; late boomers born after 1960 will have to wait until they’re 67.)

Greenspan’s commission must have failed to predict something. What?

Inequality.

Remember, the Social Security payroll tax applies only to earnings up to a certain ceiling. (That ceiling is now $106,800.) The ceiling rises every year according to a formula roughly matching inflation.

Back in 1983, the ceiling was set so the Social Security payroll tax would hit 90 percent of all wages covered by Social Security. That 90 percent figure was built into the Greenspan Commission’s fixes. The Commission assumed that, as the ceiling rose with inflation, the Social Security payroll tax would continue to hit 90 percent of total income.

Today, though, the Social Security payroll tax hits only about 84 percent of total income.

It went from 90 percent to 84 percent because a larger and larger portion of total income has gone to the top. In 1983, the richest 1 percent of Americans got 11.6 percent of total income. Today the top 1 percent takes in more than 20 percent.

If we want to go back to 90 percent, the ceiling on income subject to the Social Security tax would need to be raised to $180,000.

Presto. Social Security’s long-term (beyond 26 years from now) problem would be solved.

So there’s no reason even to consider reducing Social Security benefits or raising the age of eligibility. The logical response to the increasing concentration of income at the top is simply to raise the ceiling.

[This post is drawn from one I posted in February — before Social Security was as on the chopping block]

Economic Confidence Level Lowest Since March '09

Gee, isn't the recovery GREAT? How's your new, better paying job?

Saturday, July 23, 2011

Amy Winehouse Found Dead

According to "Raw Story", Amy Winehouse was found dead in her London apartment. She was 27 years old. Cause of death not known yet.

All that promise, all that talent ---- gone.

Rest in peace.



Ella Fitzgerald - Someone To Watch Over Me

Ella Fitzgerald - Summertime

"Shorter Obama Press Conference"

This from "Economist's View" - please follow link to original
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Shorter Obama Press Conference"

There's a reason the breakdown in budget talks happened after markets were closed -- it shows there is considerable fear about how markets might have reacted (though perhaps that's wishful thinking?). It also indicates that a "fear of what might happen" motivated agreement of some sort is still likely. (But what hold do financial markets have on the new Tea Party Republicans in the House? That's the wild card.)

Is it good news or bad news that fear might motivate an agreement?:

Shorter Obama Press Conference, by Michael Froomkin: I tried repeatedly to surrender to the House GOP, but they wouldn’t take even my most abject surrender. I have summoned them back to the White House tomorrow morning in another attempt to force them to accept it. If worst comes to worst, and they will not accept my surrender, I am prepared to accept theirs, but I really don’t like it, and will use the opportunity to campaign against Democratic values in the next election.

I'm hoping that they throw up their arms at some point, point fingers at each other as they lift the debt ceiling out of fear of what might happen if they don't, and take this fight up another day. That would at least give us a chance to try to bring some sense to Obama on entitlements and taxes, though it's looking more and more like that's a lost cause. He seems determined to show he's a Very Serious Person -- to show how tough he is -- by placing key Democratic programs on the sacrificial altar.

Update: I meant to add that the scenario may play out similarly to what happened with the financial market bailout. Congress will fail to do anything until markets actually react, and once they see what they have caused and the fear begins to mount, they will move very quickly to come to an agreement of some sort. The key will be to have something available as a back door when that happens (e.g. an improved McConnell plan).

How do you see this ending?

What you mean "our" rich dude?

This from Ted Rall -- please follow link to original
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Friday, July 22, 2011

30 of 58

So far -- 9 in Fla., 5 in Co., 16 in Ga. -- that's 30. 30 is 51.7% of the total bank failures (58).

Doesn't anyone else think that's a bit much for THREE STATES out of FIFTY??

Especially since they are VERY right-wing AND "Christian".

Isn't there something wrong here?

#58

# 58 in Colorado -- it's the 5th in that "God-fearing" state - the place that cut all services rather than raise taxes, home of a few VERY right-wing-megachurches. What happened? Didn't they PRAY hard enough? Bet they like the fact the FEDERAL GOV'T insured their savings - don't you think?
----------------------------------------------------


Bank Midwest, National Association, Kansas City, Missouri, Assumes All of the Deposits of Bank of Choice, Greeley, Colorado

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 22, 2011
Media Contact:
LaJuan Williams-Young
Office: 202-898-3876
Email: lwilliams-young@fdic.gov

Bank of Choice, Greeley, Colorado, was closed today by the Colorado Division of Banking, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with Bank Midwest, National Association, Kansas City, Missouri, to assume all of the deposits of Bank of Choice.

The 17 branches of Bank of Choice will reopen during their normal business hours beginning Saturday as branches of Bank Midwest, N.A. Depositors of Bank of Choice will automatically become depositors of Bank Midwest, N.A. Deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC, so there is no need for customers to change their banking relationship in order to retain their deposit insurance coverage up to applicable limits. Customers of Bank of Choice should continue to use their existing branch until they receive notice from Bank Midwest, N.A. that it has completed systems changes to allow other Bank Midwest, N.A. branches to process their accounts as well.

This evening and over the weekend, depositors of Bank of Choice can access their money by writing checks or using ATM or debit cards. Checks drawn on the bank will continue to be processed. Loan customers should continue to make their payments as usual.

As of March 31, 2011, Bank of Choice had approximately $1.07 billion in total assets and $924.9 million in total deposits. In addition to assuming all of the deposits, Bank Midwest, N.A. agreed to purchase approximately $853.0 million of the failed bank's assets.

Customers with questions about today's transaction should call the FDIC toll-free at 1-800-887-7340. The phone number will be operational this evening until 9:00 p.m., Mountain Daylight Time (MDT); on Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., MDT; on Sunday from noon to 6:00 p.m., MDT; and thereafter from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., MDT. Interested parties also can visit the FDIC's Web site at http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/bankofchoice.html.

As part of this transaction, the FDIC will acquire a value appreciation instrument. This instrument serves as additional consideration for the transaction.

The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $213.6 million. Compared to other alternatives, Bank Midwest, N.A.'s acquisition was the least costly resolution for the FDIC's DIF. Bank of Choice is the 58th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the fifth in Colorado. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was Signature Bank, Windsor, on July 8, 2011.

56 and 57 - BOTH in Florida

American Momentum Bank, Tampa, Florida, Acquires All the Deposits of Two Florida Banks
Southshore Community Bank, Apollo Beach and LandMark Bank of Florida, Sarasota

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 22, 2011
Media Contact:
LaJuan Williams-Young
Office: 202-898-3876
Email: lwilliams-young@fdic.gov

American Momentum Bank, Tampa, Florida, acquired the banking operations, including all the deposits, of Southshore Community Bank, Apollo Beach, Florida, and LandMark Bank of Florida, Sarasota. The two banks were closed today by the Florida Office of Financial Regulation, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with American Momentum Bank.

Southshore Community Bank had two branches, and LandMark Bank of Florida had six branches. All eight branches of the two closed banks will reopen during normal business hours beginning Saturday as branches of American Momentum Bank. Depositors of the two failed banks will automatically become depositors of American Momentum Bank. Deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC, so there is no need for customers to change their banking relationship in order to retain their deposit insurance coverage up to applicable limits.

Customers of the two failed banks should continue to use their existing branches until they receive notice from American Momentum Bank that it has completed systems changes to allow other branches of American Momentum Bank to process their accounts as well. This evening and over the weekend, depositors can access their money by writing checks or using ATM or debit cards. Checks drawn on the bank will continue to be processed. Loan customers should continue to make their payments as usual.

As of March 31, 2011, Southshore Community Bank had approximately $46.3 million in total assets and $45.3 million in total deposits; and LandMark Bank of Florida had total assets of $275.0 million and total deposits of $246.7 million. In addition to assuming all of the deposits of the two Florida banks, American Momentum Bank agreed to purchase essentially all of their assets.

Customers with questions about today's transaction should call the FDIC toll-free: for Southshore Community Bank customers, 1-800-894-2013, and for LandMark Bank of Florida customers, 1-800-889-4976. The phone number will be operational this evening until 9:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time (EDT); on Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., EDT; on Sunday from noon to 6:00 p.m., EDT; and thereafter from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., EDT.

Interested parties also can visit the FDIC's Web sites: for Southshore Community Bank, http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/southshore.html and for LandMark Bank of Florida, http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/LandMark.html.

The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) for Southshore Community Bank will be $8.3 million and for LandMark Bank of Florida, $34.4 million. Compared to other alternatives, American Momentum Bank's acquisition of the two institutions was the least costly resolution for the FDIC's DIF.

The closings are the 56th and 57th FDIC-insured institutions to fail in the nation so far this year and the eighth and ninth in Florida. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was First Peoples Bank, Port Saint Lucie, on July 15, 2011.

The Lesser Depression

Paul Krugman's latest column -- please follow link to original.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Lesser Depression

These are interesting times — and I mean that in the worst way. Right now we’re looking at not one but two looming crises, either of which could produce a global disaster. In the United States, right-wing fanatics in Congress may block a necessary rise in the debt ceiling, potentially wreaking havoc in world financial markets. Meanwhile, if the plan just agreed to by European heads of state fails to calm markets, we could see falling dominoes all across southern Europe — which would also wreak havoc in world financial markets.

We can only hope that the politicians huddled in Washington and Brussels succeed in averting these threats. But here’s the thing: Even if we manage to avoid immediate catastrophe, the deals being struck on both sides of the Atlantic are almost guaranteed to make the broader economic slump worse.

In fact, policy makers seem determined to perpetuate what I’ve taken to calling the Lesser Depression, the prolonged era of high unemployment that began with the Great Recession of 2007-2009 and continues to this day, more than two years after the recession supposedly ended.

Let’s talk for a moment about why our economies are (still) so depressed.

The great housing bubble of the last decade, which was both an American and a European phenomenon, was accompanied by a huge rise in household debt. When the bubble burst, home construction plunged, and so did consumer spending as debt-burdened families cut back.

Everything might still have been O.K. if other major economic players had stepped up their spending, filling the gap left by the housing plunge and the consumer pullback. But nobody did. In particular, cash-rich corporations see no reason to invest that cash in the face of weak consumer demand.

Nor did governments do much to help. Some governments — those of weaker nations in Europe, and state and local governments here — were actually forced to slash spending in the face of falling revenues. And the modest efforts of stronger governments — including, yes, the Obama stimulus plan — were, at best, barely enough to offset this forced austerity.

So we have depressed economies. What are policy makers proposing to do about it? Less than nothing.

The disappearance of unemployment from elite policy discourse and its replacement by deficit panic has been truly remarkable. It’s not a response to public opinion. In a recent CBS News/New York Times poll, 53 percent of the public named the economy and jobs as the most important problem we face, while only 7 percent named the deficit. Nor is it a response to market pressure. Interest rates on U.S. debt remain near historic lows.

Yet the conversations in Washington and Brussels are all about spending cuts (and maybe tax increases, I mean revisions). That’s obviously true about the various proposals being floated to resolve the debt-ceiling crisis here. But it’s equally true in Europe.

On Thursday, the “heads of state or government of the euro area and the E.U. institutions” — that mouthful tells you, all by itself, how messy European governance has become — issued their big statement. It wasn’t reassuring.

For one thing, it’s hard to believe that the Rube Goldberg financial engineering the statement proposes can really resolve the Greek crisis, let alone the wider European crisis.

But, even if it does, then what? The statement calls for sharp deficit reductions “in all countries except those under a programme” to take place “by 2013 at the latest.” Since those countries “under a programme” are being forced into drastic fiscal austerity, this amounts to a plan to have all of Europe slash spending at the same time. And there is nothing in the European data suggesting that the private sector will be ready to take up the slack in less than two years.

For those who know their 1930s history, this is all too familiar. If either of the current debt negotiations fails, we could be about to replay 1931, the global banking collapse that made the Great Depression great. But, if the negotiations succeed, we will be set to replay the great mistake of 1937: the premature turn to fiscal contraction that derailed economic recovery and ensured that the Depression would last until World War II finally provided the boost the economy needed.

Did I mention that the European Central Bank — although not, thankfully, the Federal Reserve — seems determined to make things even worse by raising interest rates?

There’s an old quotation, attributed to various people, that always comes to mind when I look at public policy: “You do not know, my son, with how little wisdom the world is governed.” Now that lack of wisdom is on full display, as policy elites on both sides of the Atlantic bungle the response to economic trauma, ignoring all the lessons of history. And the Lesser Depression goes on

A Report From Greece

This from "Naked Capitalism" - please follow link to original.

Won't the "Tea-Party-Faithful" get pissed off when they finally realize the "dirty-hippie-socialist-scum" were RIGHT all along?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A Report from Greece

Via e-mail, a reading of public sentiment in Greece from reader Scott S, who is a TV/movie industry professional and did the trailer for ECONNED. I have gotten similar. albeit more brief accounts from other readers. One reader with contacts in Greece did stress that the protests, at least as of the end of June, were overwhelmingly peaceful and added:

There is clear videotaped evidence showing certain apparently violent individuals doing things like happily entering police stations, and receiving clubs while hanging out with the police.

The Greek and international media have been successfully portraying the protests as the violence of hoodlums.

That video you posted from Clusterstock today (the policeman walks up and strikes the protester down with a club) is much more provocative if you understand Greek. Just before the protester is whacked, he cries out, “Don’t hit me!” Then random rubbish is thrown at the police – but then loud shouts are heard from the protesters, “Don’t throw anything at them!”

Now to the latest sighting via Scott S:

I’m in Greece right now staying with friends and I wanted to send you a brief report.

The mood is tense and people are very unhappy with what’s happening to their country. From what i can tell, only the extreme heat is preventing people from turning out in large numbers to protest the extremely unpopular sell-off of Greek assets to save the banks. Strikes are being planned and one Greek-Canadian businessman friend left the country in a hurry yesterday for fear of being trapped here. Look for the situation to intensify in September.

The authorities here are nervous, to say the least. The young son of my host’s close friends was sentenced two days ago to 25 years in prison for agitation. He was hardly a radical – he was a promising student of naval architecture at the Athens Technical University. Examples are being set.

A group of Greek business owners and professors with whom I’m acquainted has drafted the following call to action:

The law for the sell-off of Greek assets and Greek national sovereignty was passed to avert national bankruptcy, because the EU, ECB, IMF and Greek government insisted that bankruptcy would be the end.

Yet today the lie has been revealed. After having given up national sovereignty, archeological sites, islands, beaches, and state assets – our past and our future – Greece is now officially bankrupt.

We have the historical responsibility to stop the looting of our Greek heritage. Safeguarding the country is now in our hands.

The level of political awareness here is far higher than in America, but it will be interesting to see if people are able to change what the authorities have planned for them. I suspect that Greece is a small rehearsal for what will be coming to the US eventually, in one form or another

Guest Post: 500 Million Debt-Serfs: The European Union Is A Neo-Feudal Kleptocracy

This from "Zero Hedge" - read, then think about it. By the way -- please follow link to original, there's other good stuff there, some you many agree with, and some you may not agree with - in any case, it's worth reading.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Guest Post: 500 Million Debt-Serfs: The European Union Is A Neo-Feudal Kleptocracy


From Charles Hugh Smith from Of Two Minds

500 Million Debt-Serfs: The European Union Is a Neo-Feudal Kleptocracy

The banks of Europe are the new Feudal Manors and Masters. All Europeans now serve them as debt-serfs in one way or another.

If we knock down all the flimsy screens of artifice and obscuring complexity, what we see in Europe is a continent of debt-serfs, indentured to the banks under the whip of the European Union and its secular religion, the euro.

I know this isn't the pretty picture presented by the EU Overlords, of a prosperity built not just on debt, but on resolving the problem of debt with more debt, but it is the reality behind the eurozone's phony facade of economic "freedom."

What else can we call the stark domination of the big banks other than Neo-Feudalism? In one way or another, every one of the 27-member nations' citizens are indentured to the big international banks at risk in Europe, most of which are based in Europe.

Amidst the confusing overlay of voices and agendas, there is really only one agenda item: save the big European banks. Everything else is just mechanics. The banks are the new feudal manor houses, the bankers are the new feudal lords, and the politicians of the EU and its influential member nations are the servile vassals who enforce the "rule of law" on the serfs.

Here is the fundamental fact: there are trillions of euros of debt which can never be paid back. In a non-feudal system, one in which the banks were not the Masters, then this fact would be recognized and acted upon: something like 50% of the debt would be written off in one fell swoop, all the banks whose assets had just been wiped out would be declared insolvent and liquidated, the remaining debt would be sized to the economic surplus of each debtor nation, and a new, decentralized banking sector of dozens of strictly limited, smaller banks would be established.

To the degree that is "impossible," Europe is nothing but a Neo-Feudal Kleptocracy serving its Banker Lords.

The Greek worker whose pay has been slashed in the "austerity" demanded by the banks serves the Banker Lords, as does the German worker who will be paying higher taxes to bail out Germany and France's Banker Lords. Though the German is constantly told he is bailing out Greece, the truth is Greece is just the conduit: he's actually bailing out the EU's Banker Lords.

We can clear up much of the purposeful obfuscation by asking: exactly what tragedy befalls Europe if all the sovereign debt in the EU was wiped off the books? The one and only "tragedy" would be the destruction of the "too big to fail" banks, not just in Europe but around the world. As the big European banks imploded, then their inability to service their counterparty obligations on various derivatives to other big banks would topple those lenders.

While the political vassals call that possibility a catastrophe, it would actually spell freedom for Europe's 500 million debt serfs. From the lofty heights of the Manor House, then the loss of enormously concentrated power and wealth is indeed a catastrophe for the Lords and their political lackeys. But for the debt-serfs facing generations of servitude for nothing, then the destruction of the banks would be the glorious lifting of tyranny.

Just as a refresher, here is a definition of kleptocracy:

Kleptocracy, alternatively cleptocracy or kleptarchy, from the Ancient Greek for "thief" and "rule," is a term applied to a government subject to control fraud that takes advantage of governmental corruption to extend the personal wealth and political power of government officials and the ruling class (collectively, kleptocrats), via the embezzlement of state funds at the expense of the wider population, sometimes without even the pretense of honest service. The term means "rule by thieves".

Extracting the wealth of 500 million people via the EU's central governance machinery to serve a handful of big banks is definitely a form of systemic embezzlement. As for corruption: where are the politicians who speak to the enormous benefits of writing off these debts and destroying the power of the big banks, utterly and completely, as the only way to free the people from debt-serfdom?

While the European Central Bank (ECB) and the vassals' favorite form of oppression, the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF), print or borrow more euros into existence to fund the illusion of solvency, the cold reality is that the only way to service these trillions in impaired debt is to skim the surplus from the labor of the debt-serfs.

Since the political vassals control the means of taxation, then it is their job to squeeze hundreds of billions of euros out of the labor of their nation's debt-serfs.

There is a fatal weakness in the Grand Scheme of European Neo-Feudalism, and the lackeys in the EU are desperately trying to fix it under the banner of "integration." The fatal flaw is that the political union of the EU vassal states did not include fiscal union in which the EU could impose and control taxation within all member states.

This flaw means that the Banker Lords lack the necessary means to impose serfdom directly through the "laws" of the EU itself; instead, they must coerce the vassal political class within each member state to impose debt-serfdom on its citizenry.

This has proven cumbersome, as some nation's debt-serfs are threatening to refuse to submit to serfdom. Such a rebellion would of course bring down the entire house of cards that is Neo-Feudal Europe, and so the lackeys in Brussels and elsewhere are frantically trying to sell "fiscal integration" as the "necessary step" to centralizing the power of the banker Lords over the citizenry of all 27 EU member states.

The euro was intended to be the enforcement mechanism, but alas, voluntary agreement is not a solid foundation for neo-feudalism. At its heart, the euro currency was ultimately a Grand Arbitrage for the big European banks: they could loan essentially unlimited sums to citizens and sovereign member-states in a stable currency, and be guaranteed that they would be repaid in that same currency regardless of the weaknesses of the debtors.

That was a very sweet deal, an essentially risk-free license to generate monumental profits, all backstopped/guaranteed by the EU and ECB.

In the old, horribly risky system of independent states and currencies, any bank foolish enough to loan vast sums to weak states and its citizenry would soon find the currency in which their loans were paid would weaken to the point that even if the loans were repaid in full, their losses would be crushing.

For example, say a bank loaned Greece 1 billion drachma when the drachma was equal in value to the U.S. dollar. The loan would thus be worth $1 billion. But let's say that by the time the loan was repaid, the drachma had fallen to 50 cents. Measured in dollars, the bank suffered a loss of 50%, even when the loan was paid in full.

The euro removed all that nasty risk, and created a massive vassal class of EU bureaucrats to enforce the rules and make good any defaulted debt via the European Central Bank (ECB), the supra-national lender that served the big banks as guarantor. Ultimately, the ECB was funded by the member states' taxpayers, which spread the costs of the arbitrage over such a large number of citizens that it seemed impossible that the guarantee could be broken.

But the Banker Lords got greedy, and they overshot the carrying capacity of the EU's economy by a trillion euros; the debt loads are now so enormous that the surplus skimmed from the debt-serfs isn't enough.

That is the core dilemma of the Banker Lords and their political vassals. Since the Banker Lords lack the legal mechanism to impose new taxes via the EU itself, they must rely on the cumbersome processes of illusion and propaganda, of "extend and pretend" extensions of debt and harsh "austerity" to skim as much cream as possible.

The cloak has been removed, and the bloodied whip is now visibly in hand. In a household analogy: your mortgage has been rolled over into a new form of servitude, and your wages have been cut even as your taxes have been raised to service your debt to the Banker Lords. The vassals are bowing and scraping before their Lords, promising deeper cuts and higher taxes; yes, Master, we will obey.

But this isn't enough, of course; the Lords are demanding the rings off the fingers of the debt-serfs, and the rights to sovereign assets; they are casting a covetous eye on the comely daughter as well, and we can fully expect a discreet demand to exercise droit du seigneur, a right befitting the Lords of the new Feudalism.

Debt and Forgetfulness

Prof. Paul Krugman says it all -- again. Please follow link to original
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Debt and Forgetfulness

I keep seeing comments along the lines of “Keynesianism doesn’t work, because liberals keep running deficits even when times are good, and never pay debt down.”

Guys, how about looking at recent history (pdf)?

Between 1993 and 2001, federal debt held by the public fell from 49.2 percent of GDP to 32.5 percent of GDP. What stopped the paydown of debt wasn’t liberal big spending; it was demands from conservatives that the surplus be used to cut taxes. George Bush said that a surplus means that the government is collecting too much money; Alan Greenspan warned that we were paying off our debt too fast.

Oh, and I was very much against those tax cuts, arguing that we should pay down the debt to prepare for future needs. As a reward, I now get accused of inconsistency, for saying that deficits were bad under Bush but good now.

Anyway, get your history straight before making claims about who’s fiscally responsible.

Thursday, July 21, 2011

I like the sound of it --- IF

That is IF he (Obama) caves on any one of "the BIG three" (Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid) -- THE CAT FOOD PRESIDENT!!

If he's worried about his "legacy", there it is ----- THE CAT FOOD PRESIDENT!!

Please spread the word.

‘Anonymous’ defiant in the face of arrests

This from "Raw Story" -- please follow link to original.

By the way, THIS is how it STARTS!!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

‘Anonymous’ defiant in the face of arrests

SAN FRANCISCO — Notorious hacker group Anonymous on posted a defiant message to police Thursday and boasted of plundering sensitive data from NATO computers.

"We are not scared anymore," read an online message that purported to be a response by Anonymous and splinter group Lulz Security.

"Your threats to arrest us are meaningless to us as you cannot arrest an idea... there is nothing -- absolutely nothing -- you can possibly do to make us stop."

As if to underscore the point, a message posted at a Twitter account by "AnonymousIRC" claimed to have looted about a gigabyte of NATO data that even the rebel hacker group deemed too sensitive to release.

"Yes, we haz (sic) more of your delicious data," the Twitter post read. "You call it war; we laugh at your battleships."

US authorities arrested 16 people for cyber crimes on Tuesday, including 14 over an online attack on the PayPal website claimed by Anonymous.

The US indictment against the 14 hackers alleges the denial of service (DDoS) attacks on PayPal were "retribution" because the site terminated a donation account for the whistle-blowing group WikiLeaks.

Anonymous hackers called the PayPal attacks "Operation Avenge Assange," in reference to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, the indictment said, adding that the US raids were coordinated with police in Britain and the Netherlands.

The PayPal attack suspects were arrested during raids in Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Mexico, Ohio and the US capital Washington.

The cyber attackers used aliases such as "Toxic," "Reaper," "Anthrophobic" and "No."

Separately, two suspects were arrested under similar indictments in Florida and New Jersey, while British police arrested one suspect and Dutch police four.

In all, FBI agents made 35 raids across the United States as part of a probe into "coordinated cyber attacks against major companies and organizations," the FBI said, adding that to date more than 75 searches have been carried out.

Anonymous said its targets are governments that manipulate people with lies and fear, and corporations that lobby and ally themselves with such governments for profits.

"These governments and corporations are our enemy," the message at pastebin.com read.

"And we will continue to fight them, with all methods we have at our disposal, and that certainly includes breaking into their websites and exposing their lies."

Colombia's President Juan Manuel Santos on Wednesday tweeted that his Facebook page had been hacked by Anonymous, which took a swipe at the country's independence celebrations.

Anonymous left short phrases that are one of its calling cards, and a link to a video entitled "False Independence" on his personal page as Colombia marks the 201st year of its independence from Spain.

Anonymous also sabotaged Turkish sites last month to protest against Internet censorship.

"The Anonymous bitchslap rings through your ears like hacktivism movements of the 90s," said the online message rebutting FBI comments condemning the group's attacks.

"We're back and we're not going anywhere," it continued. "Expect us."

Anonymous rose to infamy last year with cyber attacks in support of WikiLeaks.

The group was linked to attacks on Visa, Mastercard and PayPal, which blocked donations to the controversial anti-secrecy WikiLeaks after it published a quarter million US diplomatic cables stolen in a cyber attack.

Early this year, Anonymous took credit for breaking into the website of HBGary Federal, stealing tens of thousands of email messages and temporarily routing traffic in retaliation for the technology security company's work in helping hunt the group.

Thomasson: "Civil War" May Be Necessary To Stop LGBT "Brainwashing"

Here's a post from "Right Wing Watch". It seems our "Christian"-Rabid-Right-Wing-Haters seem to think it might just take "another Civil War" to disrupt the "gay agenda" (or whatever they are calling it now.

They seem to forget -- a LOT of us "different" folks also own guns, and know how to shoot them. some of us even PRACTICE on a VERY regular basis.

It won't be all that easy to "get" us. Granted, we do not have any illegal weapons, nor are we "storing munitions" - so we do not have an "arsenal" --- but, we can surely take out 5 to 1 or better.

So, as folks say, "be careful what you wish for -- you just might get it"

Please follow link to original
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thomasson: "Civil War" May Be Necessary To Stop LGBT "Brainwashing"
Submitted by Brian Tashman on July 20, 2011 - 12:14pm

Save California’s Randy Thomasson told conservative radio talk show host Janet Mefferd yesterday that Americans may need to have a new revolution to block a new California law that makes sure history textbooks include historic LGBT figures. Thomasson, who has likened homosexuality to drunk driving and drug abuse, said that “homosexual activists want children” and accordingly “the Democrat governor gave the homosexual activists the brains of children.” He went on to say that “we’re declaring independence” just like the colonists during the American Revolution, warning that if people don’t “vote christianly then we’re heading toward a real civil war”:

Thomasson: I believe he was responding to a tremendous amount of pressure from homosexual, bisexual and transsexual activists, they were saying, ‘Hey, Jerry [Brown], we’re demanding that you sign our bill on LGBT role models for children,’ and he did it. I think they are just reminding him that they own him, he is their governor, because what the Democrats give the homosexual activists what the homosexual activists want, and the homosexual activists want children. So the Democrat governor gave the homosexual activists the brains of children, six million children in California government schools now are going to be suffering under an eighth school sexual indoctrination law, the most direct, in-your-face brainwashing I’ve ever seen.

…

Thomasson: We can harken back to our American revolution. The Declaration of Independence has a long list of sayings that the colonists were lobbying King George III about, but King George III just kept coming back with more and more taxes, he didn’t listen. So they said, well, you know what, it’s our right to alter or dissolve the government. And that’s what we’re doing, we’re declaring independence. We’re not there yet but I tell you what if we don’t start voting different and telling people how to vote and if pastors don’t repent and teach people how to vote christianly then we’re heading to toward a real civil war I’m afraid.

Mefferd: Strong words, but I’m with you all the way.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

These folks love to hear themselves talk. At the same time, I'd take them seriously. If you are a member of any currently persecuted minority, and you can legally own a gun -- save your money and BUY ONE. Learn how to use it. Practice. If you can be serious and SAFE, there is no reason you cannot DEFEND YOURSELF!!

I favor hate crime laws, but effective self defense is a great thing to add to those laws. Use your rights. Be a pro-active American. It might save your life.

A suggestion

If that "staunch progressive", Pres. Obama (I told you years ago he was not the 'savior' so many folks WANTED him to be - just look at his record) agrees to the suggestions of "The Gang of Six" - those totally un-American Senators, I suggest we find a new name for this man, the man who agreed to cut the deficit on the backs of the sick, the old, working folks, children, and asked NOTHING from the rich and corporations.

He will be known as: THE CAT FOOD PRESIDENT!

Disaster Warning: 'Gang of Six' Deal Sacrifices Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid to GOP Madness

This from "CommonDreams.org" - please follow link to original.

This is VERY IMPORTANT if you are not one of the rich bastards!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 20, 2011
12:00 PM


CONTACT: Senator Bernie Sanders
Disaster Warning: 'Gang of Six' Deal Sacrifices Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid to GOP Madness

WASHINGTON - July 20 - The latest idea to emerge in negotiations over a deficit-reduction package came from a group of senators that calls itself the Gang of Six. The proposal would be a disaster, Sen. Bernie Sanders warned. "The plan would result in devastating cuts to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and many other programs that are of vital importance to working families in this country. Meanwhile, tax rates would be lowered for the wealthiest people and the largest, most profitable corporations."

"This is an approach that should be rejected by the American people. At a time when the rich are becoming richer and corporate profits are soaring, at least half of any deficit-reduction package must come from upper income people and profitable corporations. We must also take a hard look at military spending, which has tripled since 1997."
Summary of the "Gang of Six Plan"
Provides major tax cuts to the wealthy and large corporations.

The Gang of Six plan reduces the top marginal income tax rate for the wealthiest Americans and most profitable corporations from 35 percent to as low as 23 percent (about 34 percent lower than the top tax rates under Bush).
Instead of reforming the Alternative Minimum Tax, it abolishes it altogether providing a major tax cut for the wealthiest Americans.
It reduces the deficit by about $3.7 trillion over 10 years, while providing a net tax cut of $1.5 trillion that will mainly go to the wealthiest Americans and most profitable corporations.
In other words, 100 percent of the deficit reduction achieved by the Gang of Six plan is through spending cuts to Medicare, Medicaid, education, child care, Head Start, LIHEAP, the environment, and other programs that the sick, the elderly, the children, and working families need.
Any tax revenue that is raised by closing tax loopholes for large corporations must be used to lower tax rates.
Revenue raisers cannot be used to increase spending at all. Revenue raisers can only be used to lower tax rates or reduce the deficit.

Reduces the deficit on the backs of the elderly, the children, the sick, and working families.

It imposes undefined spending caps to be in effect until at least 2015 that could only be raised by 67 votes in the Senate.

Immediately reduces Cost of Living Adjustments for Social Security benefits.

Even though Social Security recipients haven't gotten a COLA for 2 straight years, the Gang of Six believes that the formula for calculating COLAs is too generous.
Under their plan, they would ensure that seniors never get a fair COLA by shifting to the Chained-CPI which would significantly understate inflation for seniors.
Under the Gang of Six plan, ten years from now the typical 75 year old will see their Social Security benefits cut by $560 a year, and the average 85 year old will see a cut of $1,000 a year.

Slashes Medicare

Cuts Medicare by at least $298 billion over 10 years.

Holds Deficit Reduction Hostage to Cutting Social Security benefits

If the Gang of Six deficit reduction plan receives 60 votes, it will not be sent to the House until and unless the Senate also adopts a plan to reform Social Security so that it is solvent for the next 75 years.
If 60 Senators don't vote to approve an undefined 75-year Social Security solvency bill, the deficit reduction plan dies, even if 60 Senators voted to approve it.
Social Security is solvent for the next 25 years. No other government program can make that claim.

Welcome to the Recovery

This from Dr. Paul Krugman - follow link to original.

By the way we REALLY NEED a temporary stimulus - like let's build roads, and rail lines, sewers and water supply systems. You know, try to COMPETE with China and the ADVANCED countries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Welcome to the Recovery

Companies step up layoffs.

In Washington-speak, coming from both the White House and the Fed, we’re always on the road to recovery, with a few setbacks on the way. But the reality is that we’ve been basically flat on the employment front since late 2009, with nothing suggesting a sustained break back toward better performance:


Maybe someone should talk about doing something? Nah.

Oh, by the way, why are companies stepping up layoffs? It’s because of fear of the, Islamic socialist Kenyan president, WEAK DEMAND.

It's 1937 all over again - or - are "The Very Serious People" REALLY this stupid???

This from Paul Krugman's blog (follow link to original) -- a voice of SANITY in this amazing worldwide run of CRAZY!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

1937! 1937! 1937!

The Telegraph has a leaked draft of the eurozone rescue plan for Greece. The financial engineering is Rube Goldbergish and unconvincing. But here’s what leaped out at me:

9. All euro area Member States will adhere strictly to the agreed fiscal targets, improve competitiveness and address macro-economic imbalances. Deficits in all countries except those under a programme will be brought below 3% by 2013 at the latest.

OK, so we’re going to demand harsh austerity in the debt-crisis countries; and meanwhile, we’re also going to have austerity in the non-debt-crisis countries.

Plus, the ECB is raising rates.

So demand will be depressed in both crisis and non-crisis economies; this will lead to a vigorous recovery through … what?

The Serious People are determined to destroy all the advanced economies in the name of prudence.

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Allen West’s Women Problem

This from "Think Progress" - please follow link to original. ("oral relief stations"? - this man is a total PIG!!)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Allen West’s Women Problem

By Travis Waldron on Jul 20, 2011 at 4:45 pm

As has been widely discussed, Florida Rep. Allen West (R), perturbed by an incident on the House floor yesterday, attacked Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) via e-mail, calling her the “most vile, unprofessional, and despicable” member of the House of Representatives and saying she has “proven repeatedly” that she is “not a Lady.” Wasserman Schultz dismissed the attacks on MSNBC Wednesday, saying she was “unfazed” and “unsurprised” by West’s comments, given the pressure he is under to defend his votes “to end Medicare as we know it.”

But this isn’t the first time West has stirred up controversy with comments about women. Given his short time in office and his own accusations of sexism by political opponents, West has compiled a rather unimpressive record of associating with misogynists, stereotyping the role of women in society, and engaging in outright misogyny of his own:

West contributed to a Florida magazine that called women “oral relief stations”: Before he was elected to Congress, West was a monthly contributor to “Miami Mike’s Wheels On The Road,” a biker magazine that billed itself as the “South Florida Biker’s Bible.” The magazine has featured multiple overtly misogynistic articles, including one asking readers to imagine having sex with Wasserman Schultz. At other times, the magazine’s writers referred to women as “oral relief stations,” complained about women who said “their knees hurt,” depicted women as servants of men, and suggested that they should wear “slave chokers” as accessories.

West claimed liberal women were “neutering” American men and causing a crisis of leadership in America: In a speech to a Women Impacting Nation (WIN) meeting, West blamed liberal women — “these Planned Parenthood women, the Code Pink women” — for “neutering American men and bringing us to the point of this incredible weakness.” Such women were fighting “to have our men become subservient,” West said, before bizarrely adding that this new-found subservience would continue to make the nation’s debt and deficits grow.

West compared conservative women to Spartans, asking them to “raise strong men”: In the same speech, West compared conservative women to the women of Sparta, who he claimed were the real strength behind the men of the ancient Greek city-state. The role of conservative women, West said, was to “raise strong men,” just as it was in Sparta. As Mediaite’s Frances Martel noted at the time, Spartan women had no political rights and were trained to be strong solely for the betterment of males. West’s comparison to Sparta implies that he believes “strong women are to raise strong men,” Martel wrote. “Strong women are not just to be, the way strong men are.”

This list, of course, does not include the numerous policy positions West has taken that would have adverse effects on women, including his joining the fight to defund Planned Parenthood.

Already, West has begun fundraising off of the instance with Wasserman Schultz. Meanwhile, he remains defiant about his assertion that she is unladylike and continues to defend his comments by claiming that he can’t possibly be anti-woman, since he has “been married 22 years and [has] two daughters.”

Rabbi Yehuda Levin: Gay Marriage Caused The Murder Of An 8 Year-Old Hassidic Boy

This from Joe.My.God. -- please follow link to original -- then shake your head to get rid of any crazy that might have stuck to you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Rabbi Yehuda Levin: Gay Marriage Caused The Murder Of An 8 Year-Old Hassidic Boy

"Why was this [death of Kletzky] allowed to happen? Let’s think about it. If we go back to the cause, the effect was he was the victim, but the cause was a Jew [Yiddish] that the evil will come to destroy you within your midst. For too long we have been turning our cheek, we have been turning away and ignoring the agenda of the descendants of Amalek [evil]. First they [gays] wanted rights, then they wanted adoption, they wanted special protections, and ultimately they wanted marriage.

"And we all know that we did precious little. If those three or fourth thousand people [who searched for the boy when he went missing], at the direction of the greater Israel and their leaders and their common sense, would have come out, maybe, against the marriage, against this final nail in the coffin of morality, maybe we wouldn’t have had to had this episode of Amalek [evil] replay itself. This is a time for introspection. This came in the very aftermath of the marriage bill, my dear friends, and not doing anything." - NOM ally Rabbi Yehuda Levin, blaming the passage of same-sex marriage on the murder of an eight year-old Hassidic boy in Brooklyn, who was killed by a heterosexual, divorced observant Jew.

Rep. Allen West demands ‘vile’ Rep. Wasserman Schultz ‘shut the heck up’

Allen West (R-Dark Side) a Tea-Party backed congress person from Florida, where a shit load (technical term) of folks depend on Social Security and Medicare to stay alive is strongly for cuts to those programs. Real nice fellow, isn't he?

This from "Raw Story" - though it's been all over. Please follow link to this original.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Rep. Allen West demands ‘vile’ Rep. Wasserman Schultz ‘shut the heck up’

Congressman Allen West (R-FL) sent a nasty letter to Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz on Tuesday afternoon, calling her "the most vile, unprofessional, and despicable member of the U.S. House."

The email was provoked by a speech Wasserman Schultz gave on the House floor Tuesday, in which she referred to West while attacking the “cut, cap and balance” legislation proposed by Republicans.

SIMILAR: Rep. Allen West: Obama supporters are a threat to the gene pool

"The gentleman from Florida, who represents thousands of Medicare beneficiaries, as do I, is supportive of this plan that would increase costs for Medicare beneficiaries," she said after West had left. "Unbelievable for a member from South Florida.”

Wasserman Schultz added that the legislation would have a terrible effect on the U.S. economy and should be named, “duck, dodge and dismantle.”

West was not pleased with her criticism, to say the least.

"If you have something to say to me, stop being a coward and say it to my face, otherwise, shut the heck up," he wrote in his email. "You have proven repeatedly that you are not a Lady, therefore, shall not be afforded due respect from me!"

West copied members of House Republican and Democratic leadership on the email, which was first obtained by Politico.

"I don't think that Congressman West is upset at the Congresswoman, but rather with the fact that she highlighted that he and other Republicans are once again trying to balance the budget on the backs of seniors, children and the middle class," Wasserman Schultz's aide, Jonathan Beeton, said in a statement sent to Politico.

"As someone who lives in Congresswoman Wasserman Schultz's Congressional district, Congressman West knows that we have hundreds of thousands of seniors in South Florida who have paid into Medicare throughout their lives and now rely on this program to keep them healthy and active."

Obama Has Always Been for Premature Fiscal Austerity

This from Prof. Brad DeLong - please follow link to original, then link to the places he quotes -- if we would all do that, we might all learn something.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Obama Has Always Been for Premature Fiscal Austerity

Paul Krugman sends us to Mark Thoma who sends us to Jonathan Schwarz, who points out that there is evidence that Obama rejected his economists' judgment that the economy needed a bigger stimulus back at the start of 2009.

Jonathan:

A Tiny Revolution: If Only the Czar Knew: This is tough for me, because I was hating on Larry Summers before hating Larry Summers was cool. But I'm going to defend him.... One of the stories... is that some of Obama's economists believed that a stimulus package of over $1.3 trillion was needed—but Larry Summers prevented this news from getting to the president. And here we are in 2011 with a hideous economy that may be getting worse, and it's Larry Summers' fault. This seems to be based mostly on this New Yorker article from October 2009....

But if you go back and look, it's clear Obama was well aware many economists wanted a much larger stimulus bill. Here's a story from January 5, 2009:

President-elect Barack Obama said economists are suggesting a U.S. stimulus may have to be as large as $1.3 trillion, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said. Obama “has indicated that there’s at least 20 economists that he’s talked with, and all but one of those believe it should be from $800 billion to $1.2 trillion or $1.3 trillion,” Reid said after meeting with Obama on Capitol Hill.

Then two days later on January 7, Obama held a press conference:

TAPPER: Your team has talked about the stimulus package being $675 to $775 billion. But at the same time...you're going to distribute a memo in which economists say it should be between $800 billion and $1.3 trillion. How do you reconcile that difference...?
OBAMA: Well, we are still in consultation with members of Congress about the final size of the package. We expect that it will be on the high end of our estimates, but [it] will not be as high as some economists have recommended because of the constraints and concerns we have about the existing deficit.

The same day Obama was interviewed on CNBC:

MR. HARWOOD: Tomorrow you're going to give a speech and talk about your economic stimulus package...It looks like it's going to be at the high end of your range, around $775 billion. If it's correct that, as your aides have said, the danger is doing too little rather than too much...why stop at $775 billion? Why not go to the 1.2 trillion (dollars) that some economists have recommended?
PRESIDENT-ELECT OBAMA: ...We've seen ranges from 800 to 1.3 trillion, and our attitude was that, given the legislative process, if we start towards the low end of that, we'll see how it develops.... MR. HARWOOD: So it's going to get bigger.
PRESIDENT-ELECT OBAMA: Well, we don't know yet.

And on January 16, four days before Obama was inaugurated, the Washington Post published an article about a long interview with him:

Obama repeated his assurance that there is "near-unanimity" among economists that government spending will help restore jobs in the short term, adding that some estimates of necessary stimulus now reach $1.3 trillion.

So it's obvious Obama knew what his economists were saying. He had all the information he needed. You can't pin this one on my dear friend Larry Summers.

I am struck by the rhetorical difference with Clinton. Clinton would always say: "This is what the technocrat-economists say is the first-best public policy, and we ought to do that", and then begin the political bargaining. Obama, by contrast, seems to glory in splitting the difference--even when you split the difference between those who know something and those who don't--without ever saying: "we really ought to do the right thing".

What Recovery?

The "recovery" seems to be having a bit of a problem - don't you think?

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

A little truth

Found this at "Atheist Oasis" -- the cartoon is "Jesus and Mo", and they "tackle" different "issues" - please follow link to original
----------------------------------------------------------------------