---------------------------------------------------------------------
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/
I get mail:
Paul you are a subhuman communist traitor who should be deported. You are a disgrace to america’s founders and an affront to the Constitution. Republicans believe in protecting the money of WORKERS not RECEIVERS. All workers, poor and rich, should be protected from high taxes equally.
Well, I get at least one of these each day. But it’s kind of interesting to read this right after reviewing Piketty,
because one point Piketty makes is that the modern notion that
redistribution and “penalizing success” is un- and anti-American is
completely at odds with our country’s actual history. One subsection in
Piketty’s book is titled “Confiscatory Taxation of Excess Incomes: An
American Invention”; he shows that America actually pioneered very high
taxes on the rich:
When we look at the history of progressive taxation in the twentieth century, it is striking to see how far out in front Britain and the United States were, especially the latter, which invented the confiscatory tax on “excessive” incomes and fortunes.
Why was this the case? Piketty points to the
American egalitarian ideal, which went along with fear of creating a
hereditary aristocracy. High taxes, especially on estates, were
motivated in part by “fear of coming to resemble Old Europe.” Among
those who called for high estate taxation on social and political
grounds was the great economist Irving Fisher.
Just to reemphasize the point: during the
Progressive Era, it was commonplace and widely accepted to support high
taxes on the rich specifically in order to keep the rich from getting
richer — a position that few people in politics today would dare
espouse.
And as my correspondent so vividly
illustrates, many people nowadays imagine that redistribution and high
taxes on the rich are antithetical to American ideals, indeed
practically communism. They have no idea (and wouldn’t believe) that
redistribution is in reality as American as apple pie.
No comments:
Post a Comment