**This session begins with Dizzy Gillespie imitating Louis Armstrong: "...Cats gonna get away here, gonna jam a little while. Bobby boy, are you there? You there? You got them skins? When, where's the selection? "When" is the name of this number? Louie boy..."
We ought to get after the people who think they own the copyright on a Charlie Parker record. The purpose of copyrights is to protect the listener (in this case) from counterfeits and protect the interests of the artist. The artist has been dead since 1955 and, if there is a counterfeit, we'd like to hear it. "Intellectual property" is 90% nonsense. We ought to fight it. My experience is that after I complained to the offending company (in the UK in the case I attacked) they put the video back. By the way, I own https://www.jazzandclassical.net/ with which I could use some good advice. I am in Houston (I tried to set up https://www.slimwiki.com/wayburn/jazzandclassical but slimwiki keeps taking it down or else it stops working on its own.)
I'm just another old woman who has had wide ranging interests for a long time,
These include fishing, shooting, reading, cooking, and all manner of (mostly) left wing politics.
Born and bred in New York - Queens, to be precise - I now live in Texas, another state that folks seem to attack (like N.Y.) without ever having been here.
I'm also a fan of most sports -- esp. baseball, esp. the New York Yankees.
Originally a New York Giants (baseball) fan, I was crushed when they moved. It took many years wandering in the wilderness before I returned to baseball. I's all Wade Boggs fault. When I watched that artist, my love for baseball resurfaced. Since he was then a Yankee -- it had to be the Yankees.
The Mets pretended they had spiritual ties to the old Brooklyn Dodgers - no Giant fan could go there.
I tried - couldn't do it.
Happy 2023 To All Of You
-
I have often come back here to try to write some sort of a conclusion to
the years of activity on this site, but have not figured out what, exactly,
to s...
Adventures in medicine
-
This morning, I was holed up in the local hospital getting some routine
tests done. I’m getting old, I get aches and pains, so every once in a
while I have...
Thatcherism is dead: Thatcherism lives
-
Thatcherism is dead. It has ceased to be. It has expired and gone to meet
its maker. It has kicked the bucket, shuffled off this mortal coil and
joined the...
RTO Gets Serious: October 1
-
If ever a week was ripe for delaying your return to the office, it was
this one. Hurricane Idalia cleared out the weather up and down the coast,
brin...
This feed has moved and will be deleted soon. Please update your
subscription now.
-
The publisher is using a new address for their RSS feed. Please update your
feed reader to use this new URL:
*http://www.timegoesby.net/weblog/atom.xml*
Test Article
-
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Curabitur interdum
libero pulvinar pretium sagittis. Nulla at sem sollicitudin, blandit neque
nec,...
1 comment:
We ought to get after the people who think they own the copyright on a Charlie Parker record. The purpose of copyrights is to protect the listener (in this case) from counterfeits and protect the interests of the artist. The artist has been dead since 1955 and, if there is a counterfeit, we'd like to hear it. "Intellectual property" is 90% nonsense. We ought to fight it. My experience is that after I complained to the offending company (in the UK in the case I attacked) they put the video back. By the way, I own https://www.jazzandclassical.net/ with which I could use some good advice. I am in Houston (I tried to set up https://www.slimwiki.com/wayburn/jazzandclassical but slimwiki keeps taking it down or else it stops working on its own.)
Tom Wayburn
Post a Comment