-----------------------------------------------------------------
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/
What is it that makes self-proclaimed
centrists such easy marks for right-wing con men? Actually, it’s not
that much of a mystery: the centrist creed is that the two parties are
symmetrically extremist, and this means that there must, as a matter of
principle, be Serious, Honest Republicans out there — so such people
must be invented if they don’t actually exist. Hence the elevation of
Paul Ryan despite clear evidence of his con-artist nature.
And hence, also, the love affair with Chris Christie.
That affair ended up in a breakup over
Bridgegate, but the evidence of Christie’s true nature was obvious all
along. I wrote two years ago about his fiscal fakery,
and in particular the way he tried to silence independent critics of
his budget projections via crude, vicious personal attacks.
Now Vox tells us that the critics were in fact completely right, and that Christie’s budget projections were absolutely as unrealistic as they said.
Can we say that someone who tries to browbeat
anyone daring to question rosy scenarios is someone who should never,
ever be allowed near higher office? And can we also say that there’s
something very wrong with pundits who failed to see the obvious about
this guy?
No comments:
Post a Comment