------------------------------------------------------
http://www.alternet.org/visions/156071/conservative_southern_values_revived%3A_how_a_brutal_strain_of_american_aristocrats_have_come_to_rule_america_/
Conservative Southern Values Revived: How a Brutal Strain of American Aristocrats Have Come to Rule America
June 28, 2012 |
It's been said that the
rich are different than you and me. What most Americans don't know is
that they're also quite different from each other, and that which
faction is currently running the show ultimately makes a vast difference
in the kind of country we are.
Right
now, a lot of our problems stem directly from the fact that the wrong
sort has finally gotten the upper hand; a particularly brutal and
anti-democratic strain of American aristocrat that the other elites have
mostly managed to keep away from the levers of power since the
Revolution. Worse: this bunch has set a very ugly tone that's corrupted
how people with power and money behave in every corner of our culture.
Here's what happened, and how it happened, and what it means for America
now.
North versus South: Two Definitions of Liberty
Michael Lind first called out the existence of this conflict in his 2006 book, Made In Texas: George W. Bush and the Southern Takeover of American Politics.
He argued that much of American history has been characterized by a
struggle between two historical factions among the American elite -- and
that the election of George W. Bush was a definitive sign that the
wrong side was winning.
For most
of our history, American economics, culture and politics have been
dominated by a New England-based Yankee aristocracy that was rooted in
Puritan communitarian values, educated at the Ivies and marinated in an
ethic of noblesse oblige (the conviction that those who possess
wealth and power are morally bound to use it for the betterment of
society). While they've done their share of damage to the notion of
democracy in the name of profit (as all financial elites inevitably do),
this group has, for the most part, tempered its predatory instincts
with a code that valued mass education and human rights; held up public
service as both a duty and an honor; and imbued them with the belief
that once you made your nut, you had a moral duty to do something
positive with it for the betterment of mankind. Your own legacy depended
on this.
Among the presidents,
this strain gave us both Roosevelts, Woodrow Wilson, John F. Kennedy,
and Poppy Bush -- nerdy, wonky intellectuals who, for all their faults,
at least took the business of good government seriously. Among financial
elites, Bill Gates and Warren Buffet still both partake strongly of
this traditional view of wealth as power to be used for good. Even if we
don't like their specific choices, the core impulse to improve the
world is a good one -- and one that's been conspicuously absent in other
aristocratic cultures.
Which
brings us to that other great historical American nobility -- the
plantation aristocracy of the lowland South, which has been notable
throughout its 400-year history for its utter lack of civic interest,
its hostility to the very ideas of democracy and human rights, its love
of hierarchy, its fear of technology and progress, its reliance on
brutality and violence to maintain “order,” and its outright celebration
of inequality as an order divinely ordained by God.
As described by Colin Woodard in American Nations: The Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America,
the elites of the Deep South are descended mainly from the owners of
sugar, rum and cotton plantations from Barbados -- the younger sons of
the British nobility who'd farmed up the Caribbean islands, and then
came ashore to the southern coasts seeking more land. Woodward described
the culture they created in the crescent stretching from Charleston, SC
around to New Orleans this way:
It
was a near-carbon copy of the West Indian slave state these Barbadians
had left behind, a place notorious even then for its inhumanity....From
the outset, Deep Southern culture was based on radical disparities in
wealth and power, with a tiny elite commanding total obedience and
enforcing it with state-sponsored terror. Its expansionist ambitions
would put it on a collision course with its Yankee rivals, triggering
military, social, and political conflicts that continue to plague the
United States to this day. .................................................
No comments:
Post a Comment