This from ESPN, about the Joe Paterno, Penn State, Jerry Sandusky, pedophilia scandal. It seems Penn State and its leaders handled the fact of a convicted pedophile in their midst exactly the way The Most Holy Roman Catholic Church did -- by doing NOTHING. By hoping it would go away. I really do not understand this -- where is the integrity? Where is the "personal responsibility"? Where is honor? Hell, where is any thought about the victims?
Anyway, please follow link to original
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/8160430/college-football-joe-paterno-enabled-jerry-sandusky-lying-remaining-silent
By
Gene Wojciechowski | ESPN.com
Joe lied. It's that simple. And that heartbreaking.
Joe Paterno, who for so many decades represented all that was good and honorable in college athletics, lied. Through his teeth.
According
to the 267-page Freeh report, Paterno lied -- to a grand jury, no less
-- about his knowledge of a 1998 sexual assault of a young boy (Victim
6) by longtime Penn State defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky in a
football facility shower.
His lies and, worse yet, his silence
from the time of that first reported assault in 1998 helped empower a
sexual predator for the next 13 years. Paterno did nothing to stop
Sandusky. He was, said former FBI director Louis Freeh, who wrote the
report, "an integral part of this active decision to conceal."
Paterno
despised weakness in his players, yet he was the one who took part in
and, it can be reasonably argued, helped orchestrate a comprehensive
cover-up by university president Graham Spanier, athletic director Tim
Curley and school vice president Gary Schultz.
"The facts are the facts," Freeh said.
And the facts, as uncovered and determined by more than 430
interviews and 3.5 million pieces of examined emails and documentation,
detail a "total disregard for the safety and welfare of Sandusky's child
victims by the most senior leaders at Penn State."
Paterno was one of those leaders. In many ways, he was the
leader of Penn State, both symbolically and in terms of real-time
power. Asked if Paterno had the ability to stop a "culture of
concealment," Freeh said, "I think it's a very strong and reasonable
inference that he could have done so if he wished."
Instead, he
lied. And by doing so, Paterno betrayed himself, his legacy, his
university and, most of all, the children who were victims of Sandusky's
serial pedophilia.
May 13, 1998, 2:21 p.m. Curley emailed Schultz 10 days after Victim 6 was assaulted by Sandusky in the shower.
"Anything new in this department? Coach is anxious to know where it stands."
Coach Joe Paterno.
Jan. 12, 2011. Paterno testifies before the grand jury.
Question
to Paterno: "Other than the [2001] incident that Mike McQueary reported
to you, do you know in any way, through rumor, direct knowledge or any
other fashion, of any other inappropriate sexual conduct by Jerry
Sandusky with young boys?"
Paterno: "I do not know of anything
else that Jerry would be involved in of that nature, no. I do not know
of it. You did mention -- I think you said something about a rumor. It
may have been discussed in my presence, something else about somebody. I
don't know. I don't remember, and I could not honestly say I heard a
rumor."
Paterno knew. Spanier knew. Curley knew. Schultz knew.
Now we know.
The
Paterno family insists that the all-time winningest coach in major
college football history was deceived and fooled by Sandusky, that JoePa
had a blind spot that lasted from 1998 to 2011.
"To think,
however, that [Paterno] would have protected Jerry Sandusky to avoid bad
publicity is simply not realistic," said the family in its Thursday
statement.
Really? Why not? Because the Paternos say so?
Paterno
could have spoken out in 1998, but didn't. He could have spoken out in
2001, but didn't. Whatever his motives, he did nothing or, in the case
of the 2001 assault incident witnessed by McQueary, he did the absolute
minimum.
If anything, it's unrealistic to think that the most
powerful person on campus -- Paterno -- wasn't aware, on some level, of
Sandusky's behavior, or that there was much to be lost if the situation
reached critical mass.
"To his credit," said Freeh in his
introductory remarks, "Mr. Paterno stated on Nov. 9, 2011, 'With the
benefit of hindsight, I wish I had done more.'"
More? How about
anything? According to the report, Spanier, Schultz, Curley and Paterno
never alerted the school's board of trustees about the 1998 incident and
investigation.
"None
of them even spoke to Sandusky about his conduct," the report said. "In
short, nothing was done and Sandusky was allowed to continue with
impunity."
Or to put it less discreetly, he was allowed to continue to rape young boys.
Added the report: "None of these four men took any responsible action after [the] February 2001 [incident] ... "
Paterno
died nearly seven months ago and can't defend himself. But those
emails, the grand jury testimony, the facts uncovered by the Freeh
report speak for him. And they say that Paterno was a man undone by, of
all things, an inability to do the right thing.
He is not a
scapegoat. The Freeh report was critical of the entire Penn State
hierarchy, from Paterno, to Spanier, to Curley, to Schultz, to the
trustees, to even the football facility janitors who were terrified of
being fired if they reported what they saw Sandusky do to young boys.
He was not a victim. The real victims had designated numbers at Sandusky's trial. But Paterno was an enabler.
"It's
a person with a terrific legacy, a great legacy," Freeh said, "who
brought huge value not just to the university but to the program. He, as
someone once said, made perhaps the worst mistake of his life. But
we're not singling him out."
Penn State's leaders, most notably
Paterno, failed their constituency. When strength was needed, they were
weak. When action was required, they were cowards.
At the moment, I
couldn't care less if Penn State removes the Paterno statue at Beaver
Stadium, or if the school decides to shut down its football program, or
if the NCAA decides to impose its own penalties.
All I can think of are those children who lost their innocence to the evilness of Sandusky.
And that Joe lied.
Ten Economic Questions for 2025
-
Here is a review of the Ten Economic Questions for 2024.
Below are my ten questions for 2025 (I've been doing this online every year
for 20 years!). These...
2 hours ago
1 comment:
And yet they wonder that American children have no heroes. All our heroes seem to have feet of clay. I idolized JFK when he was President, I cried buckets when he was murdered. Later we find out he was just another guy who let his lust overcome him, just as so many others have done before and after him. Football players beat their wives and girlfriends, baseball players use steroids, movie stars are drug addicts -- who do we have to hold up as examples to our kids?
Post a Comment